<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosopher Zone &#187; Acceptance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosopherzone.com/tag/acceptance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com</link>
	<description>Law, Political Theory and Psychological Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is it wrong to challenge the integrity of an accepted “truth”?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenging Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrong to Challenge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All premises, even if they are accepted as truthful, should still be challenged on a regular basis. Just because a truth may be valid for one instance does not mean that it always will be. Here is an excerpt from On Liberty by John Stuart Mills: 1. If an opinion contains truth and the opinion


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosophy/silencing-the-already-silenced-voices/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Silencing the already Silenced Voices.'>Silencing the already Silenced Voices.</a> <small>For much of the 19th century, the United States was...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/articles/silencing-voices/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Silencing Distasteful Opinions'>Silencing Distasteful Opinions</a> <small>For much of the 19th century, the United States was...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?'>If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?</a> <small>Not necessarily. If you were able to eliminate the impossible,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
