<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosopher Zone &#187; Other Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosopherzone.com/tag/other-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com</link>
	<description>Law, Political Theory and Psychological Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is a bird that can fly really a free bird?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-a-bird-that-can-fly-really-a-free-bird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-a-bird-that-can-fly-really-a-free-bird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bird Fly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bird Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The definition of free is enjoying individual freedom not under constraint from being subject to the control or domination of another. Based upon this definition, just because a bird can fly, does not necessarily mean it is free. Obviously not all birds have the ability to fly, and although they cannot take to the air,


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Basic Conventions of Moral Philosophy.'>The Basic Conventions of Moral Philosophy.</a> <small>Moral philosophy is the study of ethics in relation to...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/can-a-human-function-with-only-half-a-brain/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Can a human function with only half a brain?'>Can a human function with only half a brain?</a> <small>A human being cannot function to ‘full capacity’ with the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/nihilism-the-meaninglessness-of-life/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nihilism: The Meaninglessness of Life.'>Nihilism: The Meaninglessness of Life.</a> <small>The belief of Nihilism is that all values are baseless,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-a-bird-that-can-fly-really-a-free-bird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nihilism: The Meaninglessness of Life.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/nihilism-the-meaninglessness-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/nihilism-the-meaninglessness-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freewill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaninglessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nihilisim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nihilism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Meaninglessness of Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The belief of Nihilism is that all values are baseless, purposeless and nothing in life can be known, communicated or proven. Often mistaken as extreme cynical pessimism, the radical and often frowned upon term condemns life as a purposeless existence without cause. The best description of a nihilistic individual is someone who believes in nothing,


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/life-is-such-a-bore/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Life is such a bore!'>Life is such a bore!</a> <small>I am convinced that boredom is the greatest of all...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-meaning-of-%e2%80%98meaning%e2%80%99/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.'>The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.</a> <small>When people deliberate over the meaning of life’s existence, often...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-real-reason-why-life-is-like-a-box-of-chocolates/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Real Reason why Life is like a Box of Chocolates?'>The Real Reason why Life is like a Box of Chocolates?</a> <small>If a chocolate were ever to escape the realms of...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/nihilism-the-meaninglessness-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Shark Tale</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/a-shark-tale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/a-shark-tale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shark Tale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would not be amazed if someday some angler caught a large shark, cut it open, and discovered inside was a whole person. Then the angler cut the person open, and inside was a smaller shark. And, although it would be incredible to see another human inside the smaller shark, there wouldn’t be, as the


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-is-the-difference-between-happiness-and-joy/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: What is the difference between Happiness and Joy?'>What is the difference between Happiness and Joy?</a> <small>Happiness is a state of well being. It is characterised...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-are-the-formal-steps-of-right-reasoning-according-to-descartes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: What are the formal steps of right reasoning according to Descartes?'>What are the formal steps of right reasoning according to Descartes?</a> <small>In Rene Descartes book, Discourse on Method, he devises four...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?'>If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?</a> <small>Not necessarily. If you were able to eliminate the impossible,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/a-shark-tale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliminate the Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding Reality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not necessarily. If you were able to eliminate the impossible, you would be left with the possible. Just because something is possible does not mean it is the truth. Therefore, if you eliminate the impossible you are not left with the truth only a possible entity. Related posts:Can one love truth without loving man? Can


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/can-one-love-truth-without-loving-man-can-one-love-man-without-loving-truth/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Can one love truth without loving man? Can one love man without loving truth?'>Can one love truth without loving man? Can one love man without loving truth?</a> <small>Love comes first. To love truth, you must know truth....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/thinking-truth-and-reasoning-opposed-to-reading/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Thinking: Truth and Reasoning &#8211; Opposed to Reading'>Thinking: Truth and Reasoning &#8211; Opposed to Reading</a> <small>A person may have discovered some portion of truth or...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-a-key-still-a-key-if-there-is-nothing-to-unlock/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is a key still a key if there is nothing to unlock?'>Is a key still a key if there is nothing to unlock?</a> <small>A key is nothing more than a form that humanity...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
